Name
Capella University
NURS-FPX 4030 Assessment 1 : Making Evidence-Based Decision
Professor Name
January 2024
Locating Credible Databases and Research
Evidence-based practice (EBP) refers to clinical choices that are based on clinical expertise and consider patient’s values and preferences. In addition, it gives information about high-quality patient care (Shibahaw et al .,2023). In the ever-changing arena of healthcare, the ongoing commitment to evidence-based practice (EPB) takes first place. Moreover, this assessment examines communication strategies that are designed to empower nurses with a specific focus on patient-centred care within the world of a changing medical-surgical floor. This assessment aids in making new nurses familiar with different diagnoses that are new to them like Chronic Kidney Disease. Evidence-based practice mends new nurses to be familiar with the hospital environment to provide their services to the patient in a very effective way. If you take (CKD) as a diagnosis, sometimes it becomes very serious which is known as end-stage renal disease which needs to be addressed at an emergency base, so nurses should know about the terms like peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis in order to tackle it at the right time.
Communication Strategies: A Pillar for Encouraging Diagnosis-Based Research
Dealing with unfamiliar and new diagnosis becomes a big challenge for the nurses in their duties. In the centre of this complexity, the most important aspect is the communication strategies that emerge as key factors for success. In addition engaging a newly onboarded nurse goes beyond just focusing on patient-centred care it also involves encouraging an environment for continuous learning. Encouraging questions, maintaining a supportive environment towards each other and promoting a culture of curiosity become inseparable parts of the communication strategies (Simonovich et al., 2021). The analysis of thematic networks has mentioned the importance of effective communication at three levels organizational leadership, unit leadership and nurse-to-nurse communication (Cowton, C., & Smith, F. M., 2023). Onboarded nurses may feel it very difficult to deal with diagnosis like chronic kidney disease, so it comes under a patient-centred aspect which is not the only thing that gives them the confidence to deal with it rather it is the communication skills and strategies to deal with nurses to make them familiar with the diagnosis.
Capella 4030 Assessment 1
Benefits of These Strategies in Building Professional Competence
Communication strategies contribute significantly to the broader scope of professional competence and make professional nurses adept at different diagnostic services. Furthermore, the integration of evidence-based practices not only increases their clinical expertise but also transforms them into active contributors to the fast-paced landscape of healthcare. In addition, the implementation of strong feedback processes further refines their knowledge and skills making improvements in their services. Diseases like chronic kidney disease need to be addressed with full knowledge and care because these are serious diseases that are usually called life-threatening or opportunistic diseases.
Best Places to Complete Research within the Workplace Environment
Teaching hospitals are an infrastructure that is incorporated within the esteemed confines that support optimal research endeavours. The computer lab and nurse workstations are seamlessly integrated with direct access to the Capella University Library which offers a wide range of online databases. Among these are CINAHL, PubMed, Medline and Cochrane Library. These libraries serve as a valuable resource of knowledge, offering a wide range of in-depth knowledge about diseases such as chronic kidney disease(CKD) which are sometimes more serious and life-threatening which is known as end-stage renal disease. In addition, to become aware of the treatments related to this severe stage such as peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis, a nurse professional needs a bulk amount of resources to get help.
Types of Resources for Accessing the Information
Accessing the research landscape with a profound approach makes a necessary combination of primary and secondary sources. Primary sources are sources which are one-to-one interviews of patients and Electronic Health Record (EHR) technologies that provide a wider insight into individual patient conditions. On the contrary, secondary sources comprise medical databases, reference books, and online journals that offer a broader contextual understanding that helps nurses improve their skills. The application of the CRAAP test becomes pivotal to ensure the credibility and relevance of the collected pieces of information.
Reasons for Utilizing the Places for Getting Data within the Healthcare Setting
The symbiotic utilization of the medical library and EHR technology manifests as a strategic approach. The medical library, steeped in tradition and knowledge, becomes the cornerstone for delving into historical perspectives and well-established theories. Simultaneously, the EHR technology injects real-time dynamics into the research process, facilitating the detection of patients’ updated conditions with unparalleled efficiency. This multifaceted strategy ensures a holistic approach to disease management, leveraging both the wisdom of the past and the immediacy of the present.
The Best Online Resource for the Evidence Collection
PubMed:
Managed by the National Library of Medicine, PubMed is an extensive variety of biomedical literature that is especially relevant to chronic kidney disease (CKD). Its archives provide a wealth of peer-reviewed articles that enhance any investigation into the scholarly landscape of CKD research (Manca et al., 2020). PubMed is a vital resource for learning about the progressive loss of kidney function over time because of its extensive coverage of studies linked to chronic kidney disease (CKD). Researchers and doctors frequently reference it for this reason.
The Cochrane Library:
The Cochrane Library is a renowned collection of independent, high-quality evidence and is a great resource for delving into systematic reviews. Its unique emphasis on patient-centred therapies fits in perfectly with the complex needs of medical professionals traversing the terrain of chronic kidney disease (CKD) (Garritty et al., 2021). This resource is especially important for individuals looking for a thorough analysis of interventions pertinent to the management of chronic kidney disease (CKD), as it helps to improve patient care strategies by utilizing evidence-based practices.
ClinicalTrials.gov:
Serving as a global clinical trial database, ClinicalTrials.gov provides a broad overview of trials that are either ongoing or have concluded. This makes it a valuable tool for managing and diagnosing chronic kidney disease (CKD). This repository is a vital source of experimental results and real-world data related to chronic kidney disease (CKD) (Zippel & Bohnet-Joschko, 2021). Researchers and medical professionals can use ClinicalTrials.gov to learn about the most recent developments and experimental techniques in CKD, which helps obtain a more thorough grasp of the changing landscape of options for diagnosis and therapy.
Medline:
A significant database that makes a wide range of research publications in the biomedical sciences accessible is Medline, which has the support of the US National Library of Medicine. Because of its thorough coverage, different aspects of CKD are understood holistically (Pita Costa et al., 2021).
CINAHL:
Designed to accommodate the nuances of nursing and allied health literature, CINAHL is a vital tool specifically suited for patient care with chronic kidney disease (CKD) (Matsuda & Yoshimura, 2023). This concentrated focus adds to the depth of knowledge in the CKD environment while meeting the special demands of nursing professionals. CINAHL transforms into a specialized resource, providing analysis, studies, and literature that correspond with the complexities of chronic kidney disease diagnosis and treatment. In order to improve their knowledge and provide educated, patient-centred care in the context of chronic kidney disease (CKD), healthcare professionals and nurses can rely on CINAHL.
Why are these Resources Credible Evidence-based Resources?
Cochrane Library, Medline, and PubMed are widely recognized as credible evidence-based resources in the field of healthcare for several compelling reasons. These platforms adhere to a rigorous peer-review process, ensuring that the information they provide is of the highest quality and reliability. Cochrane Library, specializing in systematic reviews and meta-analyses, employs a transparent methodology, with review protocols registered beforehand to enhance reproducibility and clarity. Similarly, Medline, accessed through PubMed, features a diverse array of peer-reviewed journals, covering a wide spectrum of medical disciplines, reinforcing the credibility of the information indexed. Both Cochrane Library and Medline contribute to evidence-based practices by synthesizing data from multiple sources, thereby reducing bias and providing comprehensive insights into various healthcare topics. Additionally, the inclusion of content from reputable peer-reviewed journals further solidifies the credibility of these resources. The commitment to transparency, diverse database coverage, and reliance on established review processes collectively position Cochrane Library, Medline, and PubMed as invaluable tools for researchers and healthcare professionals seeking trustworthy, evidence-based information to inform decision-making in the healthcare sector. The selected databases extend beyond mere accessibility because they offer unlimited access to a wide range of peer-reviewed articles, embodying the spirit of evidence-based practice. In addition, their credibility stems from a constant commitment to distributing accurate, up-to-date and relevant pieces of information. Furthermore, the universality factor, characterized by accessibility without financial constraints ensures that the onboarding nurses can improve their understanding of CKD and provide evidence-based treatments to their patients(Smith & Johnson., 2024).
Conclusion
In summation, effective communication strategies, when coupled with the judicious utilization of credible resources, form the bedrock of evidence-based practice on the medical-surgical floor. As the nursing staff navigates the intricacies of unfamiliar diagnosis like chronic kidney disease, the teaching hospital’s commitment to fostering continuous learning, supplemented by the digital resources of the Capella University Library, promises a path of growth and excellence in patient care. Health professionals should be taught evidence-based practice as part of their curriculum, as well as receive planned training to enhance their knowledge and attitudes by motivating them to do more evidence-based work(Shibabaw et al ., 2023).
References
Boswell, C., & Cannon, S. (2022). Introduction to nursing research: Incorporating evidence-based practice. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Kim, M., Mallory, C., & Valerio, T. (2020). Statistics for evidence-based practice in nursing. Jones & Bartlett Publishers.
Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2022). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
LoBiondo-Wood, G., & Haber, J. (2021). Nursing research E-book: methods and critical appraisal for evidence-based practice. Elsevier Health Sciences.
Degu A. B., Yilma T. M., Beshir M. A(2022). Inthiran A. Evidence-based practice and its associated factors among point-of-care nurses working at the teaching and specialized hospitals of Northwest Ethiopia: a concurrent study.PLoS One,17(5), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc9070954/
Saunders, H., Gallagher-Ford, L., Kvist, T., & Vehviläinen-Julkunen, K. (2019). Practising healthcare professionals’ evidence-based practice competencies: An overview of systematic reviews. Worldviews on evidence-based nursing, 16(3), 176–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12363
Kalavani K., Mohebbifar R., Rafiei S(2019). Evidence-based practice among healthcare providers: a cross-sectional study. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance,32(5),867–878. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijhcqa-08-2017-0162
Chanyalew M. A., Yitayal M., Atnafu A., Tilahun B(2021). Routine health information system utilization for evidence-based decision making in Amhara national regional state, Northwest Ethiopia: a multi-level analysis. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making,21(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01400-5
Endriyas M., Alano A., Mekonnen E., Kawza A., Lemango F(2020). Decentralizing evidence-based decision-making in a resource-limited setting: a case of SNNP region, Ethiopia. PLoS One,15(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236637
Pitsillidou M., Roupa Z., Farmakas A., Noula M(2021). Factors affecting the application and implementation of evidence-based practice in nursing. Acta Informatica Medica,29(4),281-287. https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2021.29.281-287
